/ricerca/ansaen/search.shtml?any=
Show less

Se hai scelto di non accettare i cookie di profilazione e tracciamento, puoi aderire all’abbonamento "Consentless" a un costo molto accessibile, oppure scegliere un altro abbonamento per accedere ad ANSA.it.

Ti invitiamo a leggere le Condizioni Generali di Servizio, la Cookie Policy e l'Informativa Privacy.

Puoi leggere tutti i titoli di ANSA.it
e 10 contenuti ogni 30 giorni
a €16,99/anno

  • Servizio equivalente a quello accessibile prestando il consenso ai cookie di profilazione pubblicitaria e tracciamento
  • Durata annuale (senza rinnovo automatico)
  • Un pop-up ti avvertirà che hai raggiunto i contenuti consentiti in 30 giorni (potrai continuare a vedere tutti i titoli del sito, ma per aprire altri contenuti dovrai attendere il successivo periodo di 30 giorni)
  • Pubblicità presente ma non profilata o gestibile mediante il pannello delle preferenze
  • Iscrizione alle Newsletter tematiche curate dalle redazioni ANSA.


Per accedere senza limiti a tutti i contenuti di ANSA.it

Scegli il piano di abbonamento più adatto alle tue esigenze.

'Was Nazi Germany safe country?' - Bologna court

'Was Nazi Germany safe country?' - Bologna court

'It was for majority, not Jews, homosexuals, Roma'

ROME, 29 October 2024, 17:28

ANSA English Desk

ANSACheck
- ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

- ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The Bologna court that referred a new government decree listing safe countries for repatriation to the European Court of Justice on Tuesday questioned the principle according to which a nation in which the majority of the population lives in security can be described as safe, given that the international protection system is aimed in particular at protecting minorities, citing the paradox of Nazi Germany.
    Nazi Germany was extremely safe for the great majority of the German population, with the exception of Jews, homosexuals, members of the political opposition and Roma people, it said.
    The Bologna court referred to the European Court of Justice the decree to ask which parameter should be used when determining safety and whether the principle of the primacy of EU law should prevail if a conflict arises with Italian legislation.
    The legal questions were issued in relation to an appeal presented by an asylum seeker from Bangladesh against the territorial commission for the recognition of international protection.
    And the court explicitly referred to Bangladesh, which the new decree lists as a safe country, recalling that international protection is granted to Lgbtqi+ community members, victims of gender violence, ethnic and religious minorities and people forcibly displaced by weather-related events.
    The spirit of the decree, suggested the court, would have the nature of a "political act, determined by the superior needs of the government related to migration and the defence of borders, regardless of the information and the judgement expressed by members of ministerial offices regarding the security conditions of the designated country".
    The decree greenlighted by the government on October 21 listing 19 countries as safe said Italian courts cannot rule against it on the basis of an October 4 European Court of Justice sentence based on which Rome judges had nixed the detention of a group of migrants at a new Italian-run centre in Albania.
    The 19 newly approved safe countries whose status is bolstered by the new 'primary' legislation, which was issued three days after the Rome court's ruling, are: Albania, Algeria, Bangladesh, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Cape Verde, Cote d'Ivoire, Egypt, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Morocco, Montenegro, Peru, Senegal, Serbia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia.
   
   

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © Copyright ANSA

Not to be missed

Share

Or use

ANSA Corporate

If it is news,
it is an ANSA.

We have been collecting, publishing and distributing journalistic information since 1945 with offices in Italy and around the world. Learn more about our services.